Britain in search of websites to host radioactive waste

LONDON (Reuters) – Britain needs to develop a geological storage website for prime stage radioactive waste and launched a public session on Thursday to solicit communities ready to host the power.

Around 20 p.c of Britain’s electrical energy comes from nuclear crops, which produce radioactive waste that may stay dangerous for hundreds of years and have to be saved safely.

Britain additionally plans to construct a brand new fleet of nuclear crops, beginning with EDF’s Hinkley Point C mission, to switch ageing nuclear reactors and coal crops coming offline within the 2020s.

A geological website would see radioactive waste buried not less than 200 meters underground in a rock formation that protects it and acts as a barrier towards the radioactivity escaping.

“We owe it to future generations to take action now to find a suitable permanent site for the safe disposal of our radioactive waste… Planning consent will only be given to sites which have local support,” Richard Harrington, a minister on the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), stated in a press release.

Around 80 p.c of Britain’s nuclear waste is at present saved on the Sellafield nuclear plant website in Cumbria, within the northwest of England.

A brand new geological disposal facility may create as much as 2,000 jobs and convey not less than eight billion kilos ($11 billion) to the financial system over its lifetime, BEIS stated.

The consultations, which apply to England, Northern Ireland and Wales, are open to all people and can run for the subsequent 12 weeks, BEIS stated.

The Sellafield plant is over 60 years previous and a few nuclear specialists have stated geological storage websites are a greater storage answer for the long run.

“A geological disposal facility is widely accepted as the only realistic way to dispose of higher activity nuclear waste for the long term,” Iain Stewart, director of the Sustainable Earth Institute, Plymouth University stated within the BEIS assertion.

Environmentalists criticized the plan.

“Since there is no permanent solution for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel, the responsible thing to do would be to stop producing more of it instead of just passing the radioactive buck to future generations,” Greenpeace UK chief scientist Doug Parr stated.

Scotland is excluded from the session as its devolved government has a coverage that radioactive waste must be saved in near-surface websites, reasonably than be buried underground.

($1 = zero.7006 kilos)

Reporting By Susanna Twidale; Editing by Susan Fenton

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Tech News


Show More

Related Articles